Bitcoin is trying to defend key support near $15,500. Cryptocurrencies came under pressure again amid reports from Bloomberg, which citing its sources indicated that lending cryptocurrency giant Genesis will file for bankruptcy if it does not receive external funding:
- Momentary speculation around the proof of reserves of the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ceased after Coinbase presented the complete reserves it holds for the trust (a report released showed the reserve balance as of October 30), and Bernstein analysts indicated that the ownership structure does not expose the trust to collapse if Genesis Capital declares bankruptcy. Both entities are part of the Digital Currency Group, created by Barry Silbert;
- Genesis Capital is drowning in problems in the face of the debt of its lending division, whose debt at the end of September this year stood at nearly $2.9 billion. The company similarly to the bankrupt Celsius Network lent unsecured loans in the bull market. An investigation by Quartz analysts revealed the scandalous practices Genesis used to lend funds. In addition to unsecured loans devoid of thorough verification, some of the 'secured' loans were to be backed by collateral from other customers creating structural risk;
- Reuteres reports indicate that Genesis was to lend funds 'secured' by the currently virtually worthless FTT token to the collapsed Alameda Research fund, the extent of losses from this is not yet known. The fund was also supposed to lend its own clients' collateral to other borrowers, which brings to mind practices, from the 2008 crisis. The fund gained popularity in the 2018 bull market when it lent funds to financial institutions at attractive low interest rates, reducing paperwork to the bare minimum, unlike its competitors.
24.6 million addresses out of a total of 47.9 million are currently recording losses on Bitcoin investments, according to data provided by analyst firm IntoTheBlock. This means that nearly 51% of the BTC market has an unrealized loss. About 45% have an unrealized gain, while roughly 3 to 4% are near the 'break even' level, i.e. roughly neutral. By comparison, however, in January 2019, the percentage of addresses at a loss (out-of-the-money) was even higher at 55%. Bitcoin then reached a bottom near $3200 and began a bull market three months later. In contrast, the percentage of addresses at a loss reached 62% during the 2015 bear market. Situations when the majority of addresses holding Bitcoin record losses are rare, the last time such a situation occurred was during the March 2020 coronavirus crash. While past data does not guarantee future performance, it may indicate that the percentage of losing addresses in the bottoms of each successive bull market is getting smaller, which could herald an impending bullish momentum. On the other hand, it is still unclear how far the systemic domino effect caused by the collapse of FTX will 'pull' Bitcoin to even lower levels. Source: IntoTheBlockThe chart shows that the total supply in the hands of long-term investors fell by nearly 85,000 BTC in the face of FTX's collapse, signaling a scale comparable to the collapse of Luna when the LTH group reduced reserves by 101,000 BTC. The scale, however, is still smaller than June's sell-off and July's rally, when LTH addresses distributed some reserves. Source: GlassnodeÂ
Kezdjen befektetni még ma, vagy próbålja ki ingyenes demónkat
ĂlĆ szĂĄmla regisztrĂĄciĂł DEMĂ SZĂMLA Mobil app letöltĂ©se Mobil app letöltĂ©seBitcoin chart, H4 interval. The major cryptocurrency is moving in a downtrend and testing the levels of the annual lows of November 10. Buyers last night halted declines below $15,500 and are struggling to exhaust supply forces. If the bulls manage to hold this level, we can expect an upward correction toward $17,000. If not, the way to levels near $14,000 i.e. the June 2019 peaks is likely to be opened. Source: xStation5
Ezen tartalmat az XTB S.A. kĂ©szĂtette, amelynek szĂ©khelye VarsĂłban talĂĄlhatĂł a következĆ cĂmen, Prosta 67, 00-838 VarsĂł, LengyelorszĂĄg (KRS szĂĄm: 0000217580), Ă©s a lengyel pĂ©nzĂŒgyi hatĂłsĂĄg (KNF) felĂŒgyeli (sz. DDM-M-4021-57-1/2005). Ezen tartalom a 2014/65/EU irĂĄnyelvĂ©nek, ami az EurĂłpai Parlament Ă©s a TanĂĄcs 2014. mĂĄjus 15-i hatĂĄrozata a pĂ©nzĂŒgyi eszközök piacairĂłl , 24. cikkĂ©nek (3) bekezdĂ©se , valamint a 2002/92 / EK irĂĄnyelv Ă©s a 2011/61 / EU irĂĄnyelv (MiFID II) szerint marketingkommunikĂĄciĂłnak minĆsĂŒl, tovĂĄbbĂĄ nem minĆsĂŒl befektetĂ©si tanĂĄcsadĂĄsnak vagy befektetĂ©si kutatĂĄsnak. A marketingkommunikĂĄciĂł nem befektetĂ©si ajĂĄnlĂĄs vagy informĂĄciĂł, amely befektetĂ©si stratĂ©giĂĄt javasol a következĆ rendeleteknek megfelelĆen, Az EurĂłpai Parlament Ă©s a TanĂĄcs 596/2014 / EU rendelete (2014. ĂĄprilis 16.) a piaci visszaĂ©lĂ©sekrĆl (a piaci visszaĂ©lĂ©sekrĆl szĂłlĂł rendelet), valamint a 2003/6 / EK eurĂłpai parlamenti Ă©s tanĂĄcsi irĂĄnyelv Ă©s a 2003/124 / EK bizottsĂĄgi irĂĄnyelvek hatĂĄlyon kĂvĂŒl helyezĂ©sĂ©rĆl / EK, 2003/125 / EK Ă©s 2004/72 / EK, valamint az (EU) 2016/958 bizottsĂĄgi felhatalmazĂĄson alapulĂł rendelet (2016. mĂĄrcius 9.) az 596/2014 / EU eurĂłpai parlamenti Ă©s tanĂĄcsi rendeletnek a szabĂĄlyozĂĄsi technikai szabĂĄlyozĂĄs tekintetĂ©ben törtĂ©nĆ kiegĂ©szĂtĂ©sĂ©rĆl a befektetĂ©si ajĂĄnlĂĄsok vagy a befektetĂ©si stratĂ©giĂĄt javaslĂł vagy javaslĂł egyĂ©b informĂĄciĂłk objektĂv bemutatĂĄsĂĄra, valamint az egyes Ă©rdekek vagy összefĂ©rhetetlensĂ©g utĂĄni jelek nyilvĂĄnossĂĄgra hozatalĂĄnak technikai szabĂĄlyaira vonatkozĂł szabvĂĄnyok vagy egyĂ©b tanĂĄcsadĂĄs, ideĂ©rtve a befektetĂ©si tanĂĄcsadĂĄst is, az A pĂ©nzĂŒgyi eszközök kereskedelmĂ©rĆl szĂłlĂł, 2005. jĂșlius 29-i törvĂ©ny (azaz a 2019. Ă©vi Lap, mĂłdosĂtott 875 tĂ©tel). Ezen marketingkommunikĂĄciĂł a legnagyobb gondossĂĄggal, tĂĄrgyilagossĂĄggal kĂ©szĂŒlt, bemutatja azokat a tĂ©nyeket, amelyek a szerzĆ szĂĄmĂĄra a kĂ©szĂtĂ©s idĆpontjĂĄban ismertek voltak , valamint mindenfĂ©le Ă©rtĂ©kelĂ©si elemtĆl mentes. A marketingkommunikĂĄciĂł az ĂgyfĂ©l igĂ©nyeinek, az egyĂ©ni pĂ©nzĂŒgyi helyzetĂ©nek figyelembevĂ©tele nĂ©lkĂŒl kĂ©szĂŒl, Ă©s semmilyen mĂłdon nem terjeszt elĆ befektetĂ©si stratĂ©giĂĄt. A marketingkommunikĂĄciĂł nem minĆsĂŒl semmilyen pĂ©nzĂŒgyi eszköz eladĂĄsi, felajĂĄnlĂĄsi, feliratkozĂĄsi, vĂĄsĂĄrlĂĄsi felhĂvĂĄsĂĄnak, hirdetĂ©sĂ©nek vagy promĂłciĂłjĂĄnak. Az XTB S.A. nem vĂĄllal felelĆssĂ©get az ĂgyfĂ©l ezen marketingkommunikĂĄciĂłban foglalt informĂĄciĂłk alapjĂĄn tett cselekedeteiĂ©rt vagy mulasztĂĄsaiĂ©rt, kĂŒlönösen a pĂ©nzĂŒgyi eszközök megszerzĂ©sĂ©Ă©rt vagy elidegenĂtĂ©sĂ©Ă©rt. Abban az esetben, ha a marketingkommunikĂĄciĂł bĂĄrmilyen informĂĄciĂłt tartalmaz az abban megjelölt pĂ©nzĂŒgyi eszközökkel kapcsolatos eredmĂ©nyekrĆl, azok nem jelentenek garanciĂĄt vagy elĆrejelzĂ©st a jövĆbeli eredmĂ©nyekkel kapcsolatban.